Wednesday 24 August 2016

The times are a testimony to Jesus Christ birth


I am an amateur historian and there is one thing which has reigned on my mind for sometime now, Historians have long used BC/AD in references to times, with an assumption that Christ was born around 7 to 4 BC. Therefore the birth of Christ forms the zero year which separates BC and AD. Some historians and antagonists over time felt that using BC/AD to reference to time gives Jesus Christ a superior status (which He rightly possess). This antagonism resulted into a creation of CE/BCE parallel system i.e Common Era and Before Common Era to reference to time. The Common Era referred to here is basically the Christian or vulgar era. Basically the truth renamed. Further the actual mark or the zero year is a mirage as far as this group of antagonists historians and scientists is concerned, since they do not want to acknowledge the year as denoting to the birth of Jesus Christ. So atheists and other groups in denial of Christ's birth, should start devising a different system of referencing to time rather than BCE/CE. And i can assure you i have been checking around and not even the great Greeks or even Dionysius Exiguus himself or Johannes Kepler provides an alternative.... reference to CE/BCE as common or christian or vulgar era does not take the facts on the birth of Jesus Christ away it only provides a blind eye to the truth, ............................... 
Christ was born, lived amongst us, died for our sins, is risen and we are waiting for His second coming and the times are a testimony to this.